INTERVENTION ENGINE

Workforce Interventions

Proposed actions for human review. Exploratory scores are not calibrated probabilities, and suggested actions do not establish prevention. Completion marks stay in this browser.

TOTAL ACTIONS
8
IMMEDIATE
2 actions
THIS WEEK
3 actions
COST IF IGNORED
£755k+
COMPLETED
0 / 8
Intervention progress0 of 8 complete · 0%
🚪Skip-level conversation — Engineering retention
ImmediateRetention

A senior engineer is flagged at 81/100 flight risk. No 1:1 logged in 6 weeks. 14 consecutive high-load days. Risk window: 30 days. Estimated exposure: £97,500.

▾
ACTIONS
#1Schedule skip-level conversation within 48 hours
CEO / VP Eng1 hour
#2Reduce the engineer's sprint scope by 30% this cycle
Engineering Manager15 min
#3Review the engineer's career progression conversation log
HR Director15 min
EXPECTED IMPACT
Synthetic proposed action; no measured benefit or prevention is established.
COST IF IGNORED
£97,500 replacement cost + 3-month productivity gap
Linked to: Engineering Manager, Engineering team burnout
🧭Coaching intervention — Customer Success manager
ImmediateLeadership

Customer Success manager scores C-grade (74/100 risk). 34% team turnover — highest in org. No 1:1s logged this month. Trust score: 41/100. 3 of 7 direct reports show elevated flight risk.

▾
🔥Engineering team workload review
This weekBurnout

Engineering team burnout score: 61/100, trending up 8 points over 6 weeks. The Engineering Manager's team has 2 high-risk direct reports. Sprint velocity declining alongside rising cognitive load scores.

▾
🚪Role clarity conversation — Product Manager
This weekRetention

The Product Manager (8mo tenure) has a flight risk score of 67/100. Drivers: low onboarding satisfaction (42/100), unclear decision-making authority, high meeting load limiting deep work.

▾
🔥Growth pathway conversation — Data Scientist
This weekBurnout

A data scientist (31mo tenure) shows stagnant growth trajectory for 8 months, low flow score average (38/100), and declining engagement with team rituals. Flight risk: 58/100.

▾
🧭Engineering Manager — increase 1:1 frequency
This monthLeadership

Engineering Manager currently running monthly 1:1s — below benchmark. 2 high-risk direct reports. Burnout score 61/100. Risk score trending up 8 points.

▾
⚡Meeting audit — Engineering and Product teams
This monthProductivity

Average meeting load across Engineering and Product is 28h/week per person — 40% above benchmark. Deep work blocks reduced from 3.2h/day to 1.8h/day over 8 weeks.

▾
⚖️ISO 45003 evidence trail — Q3 audit readiness
This monthCompliance

Current compliance score: 31/100 (Low risk — good). Next audit window: Q3 2026. Evidence pack requires documented interventions, risk assessments, and management actions.

▾

PsychFlo guide

Guided chatbot · prepared answers, no language model

Find the right demo or next step. Messages stay in this page’s memory; don’t enter personal or confidential information.

Full decision copilot